Comment on 500,000 households cancel TV licence putting BBC future in jeopardy

• Agent641@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  TV detection vans are real but they aren’t high tech. Some people think they have fancy antennas that can detect your TV. Other people think it’s all a bluff and the antennas on the roof of the van are fake just for show.

  The truth is much simpler. The antennas on the top of the van are real, but they just receive regular TV broadcasts. The technician watches TV in the back of the van. They also point a parabolic microphone at your window so they can hear what’s happening inside the house.

  If there’s a TV playing in the house, the technician flips through TV channels to see if they can synch up the mic audio with the broadcast audio. If they record a perfect match, that’s sufficient to prove that you’re watching broadcast TV, not just a recording, VHS, DVD, or streaming service.

  source

  • rollerbang@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    And that’s a legal tactic? That’s basically spying on people and what they do in their houses.

    source

    • Agent641@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Welcome to Britain, where the laws are made up and your rights don’t matter

      source

      • rollerbang@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I actually remember seeing this before. But if not a warrant, what did they have then? Just a pretend paper? Because if it was an actual warrant, they would have gone in?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Hupf@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Also how does this hold up in court if the only “evidence” is presented by people who are in a conflict of interest and can easily falsify it (point the microphone at a prepared tv / different house)?

      source

      • rollerbang@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I’m guessing that’s the reason they’re pressing to to in and inspect. Even though at the end they didn’t go. So they weren’t justified at all.

        They’re just pressing so that people cave in and think "well they must be in the right, they have the law (policeman) on their side.

        I seriously doubt that they’ve ended up suing the guy.

        source
  • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Surely that could be easily defeated with a super basic signal delay circuit?

    source

    • Agent641@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Probably, yeah. You would probably sell a bunch of them. This isn’t the only method they use, they look through windows from the street, knock on doors etc, but it would help cut down on tv licensing van hits

      source