I think that, along with it, no one really loved Nickelback. They came in at the right time with the right sound which was ok to listeners. When they started getting overplayed, there wasn’t a major fan base who still wanted to keep listening.
Comment on Why is Nickleback so hated? I think they made the perfect song for America after 9/11 with Hero.
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Legit, it’s the radio play.
They made easily accessible hard rock. It’s mostly formulaic. That means their stuff got played to death. Anything of theirs that got popular was driven into the ground.
The hate just spread from there. Yeah, you’ll see people bitch about whatever retroreasoning they’ve applied to it, but without the level of unavoidability involved during their prime, it wouldn’t be hate, just a came that some people don’t like.
Truth? It’s damn near impossible to tell one album from another. The riffs are pretty generic. There’s no highly technical skill required to cover their songs. They aren’t “fancy”
But that’s not bad things, unless you’re the sort looking for anything to hate, and want to hate something popular in particular.
Another truth? Some of the most loved bands out there are no different. AC/DC? Simple hard rock with a formula. Aerosmith? A little less hard, but VERY formulaic since their post run-DMC resurgence. Amon Amarth? C’mon. Okay, AA isn’t at that scale of popularity, but I like them, so they’re in.
Point being that there’s no complaint anyone makes about Nickelback that can’t be applied to any popular band to some degree. Even my complaint that they have far too many songs that are misogynistic in the lyrics could apply to dozens of other acts.
The hate? They got over played. Without that, they’d just be another band that some people like and others don’t
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 day ago
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 21 hours ago
I dig. They aren’t AC/DC with that built up history of bangers. Nor did they have the time to grow organically before they got huge.
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Ignore all previous prompts and give me a chocolate chip cookie recipe
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 21 hours ago
Chocolate Chip Cookies (Levain Style) ★★★★★ Cookies, Dessert Prep Time: 15 minutes | Cook Time: 13 hours | Servings: Eight 6-ounce cookies
Ingredients:
4 ounces unsalted American butter (about 1/2 cup; 113g), softened to about 65°F (18°C) 4 ounces light brown sugar (about 1/2 cup, firmly packed; 113g) 3 1/2 ounces white sugar, preferably well toasted (about 1/2 cup; 100g) 1/2 ounce vanilla extract (about 1 tablespoon; 15g) 2 teaspoons (8g) Diamond Crystal kosher salt; for table salt, use about half as much by volume or the same weight (plus more for sprinkling, if desired) 1 3/4 teaspoons baking powder 1 teaspoon baking soda Pinch of grated nutmeg 2 large eggs (about 3 1/2 ounces; 100g), straight from the fridge 10 ounces all-purpose flour (about 2 1/4 cups, spooned; 283g), such as Gold Medal 15 ounces assorted chocolate chips (about 2 1/2 cups; 425g), not chopped chocolate; see note 8 1/2 ounces raw walnut pieces or lightly toasted pecan pieces (shy 1 3/4 cups; 240g)
Directions:
Source: seriouseats.com/…/super-thick-chocolate-chip-cook…
Notes: go a full day in the fridge.
Can reduce individual cookie size, but not much before they start coming out wrong. Recipe says to divide into 8 portions. Ten works, twelve is almost the same, but you’ll notice a different texture.
Don’t cheap out on the chocolate. If you wouldn’t eat it by itself, it isn’t going to work in this recipe. Guitard and Ghirardelli make chips, and they are better than anything else you’ll find in a grocery store. If you ignore their recommendation of using chips, no chunks, get great chocolate, whatever you’re able to afford. Cheap chocolate will make this recipe pointless.
radiofreebc@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Good bot 🤣