They use the same bottle for a 400-pill bottle and a 200-pill bottle.
Comment on I feel like this could have been a smaller package
i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
I bought the bottle of 360 pills at Walmart a couple years ago. Finally ran out and got more. Same brand. Same price.
Suddenly there’s only 200 pills in the bottle AND it’s in a larger bottle now? wtf?
ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
NepGinger@lemy.nl 3 days ago
Are the pills the same size?
i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
Identical.
NepGinger@lemy.nl 3 days ago
That’s even weirder - I know it’s all marketing, but how do they not take into account that there are people that can compare them?
Horsey@lemmy.world 3 days ago
The average person wouldn’t demonstrably care. Same thing with shrinkflation. Also, depending on where you live, the average IQ and general knowledge thresholds people meet are lower than you think.
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
AKA Shrinkflation. Retail is full of it, and it is usually done in a way that leaves the original package size alone. The goal is to reduce the amount of product inside of the package, without changing the package noticeably. The linked Wiki page uses Toblerone as an example, but here is another good example: Image
The package dimensions for the peanut butter appear to stay the same, (at least when it is sitting on a shelf) so customers don’t immediately notice the smaller size. They just think “my last jar was this same size, so I’m getting the same amount.” It feels like the same amount, even though it is much less for the same price.
My personal favorite example is the Terry’s Chocolate Orange, which slightly reduced the thickness of each individual wedge. By adding that air gap between wedges, they were able to reduce the amount of chocolate in each orange by like 15%, while still maintaining the overall size and shape.