Comment on Demon slayer
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 days agothrowing rocks at a puppy may be “fun”, but question, is it right?
Well, I mean, yes? Exodus 21:28 - you’re to kill an animal (often translated as an ox) that kills a person by stoning to death.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 4 days ago
did the puppy kill a person?
and the old testament was fulfilled by Jesus
and it was in preparation of the Messiah
and he came down to Earth, died and was ressurected
who prepares for the groom’s arrival even after he has arrived instead of addressing and serving him?
And well, the ten commandments are just the basics that you need to follow
research theology further
and read Humanitae Vitae
for why this kind of stuff is bad
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Hu-man-it-ee vit-ay? My goodness, what a new and novel document I have never encountered before. This surely will change my outlook!
… Yeah, listen, Paulmbo #6 sat by preaching about morality while blithely presiding over the foundation of a pedophilia ring so massive it made epstien look like a weekend hobbyist. Not only that, by publishing Humanitae Vitae he’s directly responsible for causing the rise of catholic anti intellectualism and the decline of the church into the joke of an institution it is today. He’s a reaaaaaally bad choice for a source.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 3 days ago
ad hominem
and this presides over the moral atrocities of the Sexual Revolution
youtu.be/dLqr-AFkK6Y in video form
and “pedophilia ring”? the relocation of priests happened on the diocesan level and not the vatican level
the entirety of the US Bishops and president and vice prident of the USCCB were summoned to Rome for this
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Correct! Well done! You get a cookie! However, addressing the applicability and/or bias of a source (as I have done here) is not in itself fallacious, even if it involves addressing their character or actions.
Ex: Donald Trump says pedophilia isn’t bad. Pointing out that he’s a poor authority on the morality of pedophilia because he himself is a pedophile and rapist is not an ad-homenim either, because it’s not a dismissal of his argument, it’s a dismissal of the value of his argument based on the present biases. It’s a subtle but important distinction.
The holy see is internationally recognized as a sovereign entity - I must have missed how that means it’s only in charge for the good bits, and isn’t in responsible for the bad ones.
I apologize, but I am not watching a youtube vid for this.
Yeah I confess I think the beatles kinda sucked, too.