Comment on Demon slayer

<- View Parent
Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

ad hominem

Correct! Well done! You get a cookie! However, addressing the applicability and/or bias of a source (as I have done here) is not in itself fallacious, even if it involves addressing their character or actions.

Ex: Donald Trump says pedophilia isn’t bad. Pointing out that he’s a poor authority on the morality of pedophilia because he himself is a pedophile and rapist is not an ad-homenim either, because it’s not a dismissal of his argument, it’s a dismissal of the value of his argument based on the present biases. It’s a subtle but important distinction.

the relocation of priests happened on the diocesan level and not the vatican level

The holy see is internationally recognized as a sovereign entity - I must have missed how that means it’s only in charge for the good bits, and isn’t in responsible for the bad ones.

youtu.be/dLqr-AFkK6Y in video form

I apologize, but I am not watching a youtube vid for this.

and this presides over the moral atrocities of the Sexual Revolution

Yeah I confess I think the beatles kinda sucked, too.

source
Sort:hotnewtop