Then how come none of the AI companies are actually profitable?
Comment on 🤔 Interesting
clifmo@programming.dev 1 month ago
Turns out distilling all the world’s information into a friendly interface is worth something
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
clifmo@programming.dev 1 month ago
So only profitable things have value?
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
To capitalists? Yeah
clifmo@programming.dev 1 month ago
So, I’m a little lost. You think AI isn’t useful because it isn’t generating profits? Or you think it’s not useful because of how it distills information and presents it in a chat interface (which was the only point I made)?
Sunforged@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Search engines did that decades ago. AI presents it’s results as fact without the ability to provide a source, it’s an aggressively unfriendly interface.
grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
It’s presented as friendly but yeah it’s actually incredibly hostile and predatory
clifmo@programming.dev 1 month ago
The interface is friendly. Agreed.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Oh, they provide sources. At least, some of them do. It’s just that the sources don’t always back them up. It’s going to gin up sources whether it’s correct or not, because that’s what it’s programmed to do.
Sunforged@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I haven’t used the latest models, I am really fucking over it, but yeah when I would ask for sources on why the model provided the answer it did every time they would jist hallucinate a web address.
clifmo@programming.dev 1 month ago
Oh yea 25 years ago search engines were amazing
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
And it only makes sense that they’d get worse over time because technology has gotten worse.
Errr, wait…
PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s not the same. The ability to converse about a topic is pretty dope. Compared to ring to find relevant information about a very unique case for instance.