Comment on Eggy
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
None of this fat is intramuscular and, visually, this is objectively too close to an idealized body type to have been anything but a suggestion to have a pizza.
Comment on Eggy
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
None of this fat is intramuscular and, visually, this is objectively too close to an idealized body type to have been anything but a suggestion to have a pizza.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I thought this was visceral fat?
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
On first glance, I thought so too. But it would be a truly bizarre amount of visceral fat for this body type, so it must be at least a 50/50 cutaneous/visceral split. She should be bulging, not curvy. But above the intestines, that’s definitely mostly visceral. The legs are the bit that made me second guess everything. The “skin” is fairly thick, but somehow the fat is substantially thinner? I don’t follow. Are they lipomas? What’s happening?