No? I think it still looks fine. I think Pixar did pretty well in choosing what types of things they could get away with animating at the time with their early movies.
still looks decent, yeah, but modern animations just look way different. there’s something a little bit off about that maybe, though I can’t tell from a still image. that image might just be uniquely bad, i remember the movie being way more beautiful overall.
The contrast and how vivid it is look off from what I remember. Hardware for rendering has improved a lot since it came out. Maybe the animation masked the “simplicity” for lack of a better term.
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 5 days ago
wow nemo’s graphics really didn’t age well
Zorcron@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
No? I think it still looks fine. I think Pixar did pretty well in choosing what types of things they could get away with animating at the time with their early movies.
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 5 days ago
still looks decent, yeah, but modern animations just look way different. there’s something a little bit off about that maybe, though I can’t tell from a still image. that image might just be uniquely bad, i remember the movie being way more beautiful overall.
sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
The contrast and how vivid it is look off from what I remember. Hardware for rendering has improved a lot since it came out. Maybe the animation masked the “simplicity” for lack of a better term.
vogi@piefed.social 5 days ago
the unterwater parts arent even the worst, wait till you see the human renders. they scared me for life even back then.
AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 5 days ago
That might have been intentional