Comment on šæ
OwOarchist@pawb.social āØ2ā© āØmonthsā© agoWell, I suspect it was both.
Theyāre going to have lots of skilled, well-treated and well-paid workers there. The kind of workers doing the organizing, planning, directing, and finish work. Their equivalent of engineers, managers, foremen, skilled craftsman. Iām sure they could fill an entire dormitory with just decorative hieroglyphics carvers alone. A large pyramid would require hundreds, maybe thousands of these skilled/experienced workers.
But then thereās also the 200 poor bastards hauling ropes to pull a giant stone slab up a ramp. And another 200 waiting at the bottom for their turn to haul the next one. And Iām betting those workers were not well-paid and well-treated. Those are the ones who were likely slaves, used basically as beasts of burden.
kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world āØ2ā© āØmonthsā© ago
Can you find any sources supporting that?
Everything Iāve come across from this millenium says otherwise. I found this article from Harvard Magazine from 2003 that talks about the archeological findings