Comment on Robbed

texture@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• restingOface@quokk.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It’s called a shitpost, mom. All the cool kids are doing it.

  source

  • texture@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    back in my day shitposts were funny

    source

    • restingOface@quokk.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      A shitpost is often a joke, but not always. Sometimes, a shitpost is just a shitpost.

      source

      • texture@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        i didnt say anything about a joke

        source
      • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Well this post is certainly shit.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      This is goddamned hilarious, log off

      source

      • texture@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        whats funny about it to you? describe it

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The Wuthering Heights director Emerald Fennell said it was “unfortunate” that a scene showing Margot Robbie’s hairy armpits did not make the final cut, because women in period adaptations are often shown with clean-shaven underarms.

  Robbie’s character, Cathy, had “extremely hairy armpits” in the 2026 adaptation of the novel, but “unfortunately the scene that we see them didn’t make it in there”, said the director.

  Cathy having unshaven pits “was so important to me”, she said, adding that she often wonders “where are the razors that these women are using?” when watching Jane Austen adaptations.

  “They’re all kind of hairless like eels. I’m like: ‘What’s going on? It’s completely mad.’”

  I think something pretty normal and understandable that people who are used to drowning in other people’s vocal paraphilias online will immediately and erroneously assume is something sexual.

  source

  • texture@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    yeah id just assume the hair didnt make the final cut bc patriarchal bullshit. i dont see how this is a shitpost so much as just a shitty thing that happened? i figure we judge and control women’s bodies more than enough day to day that we dont really need it in the shitpost sub. idk, just struck a cord with me this time i guess.

    source

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You’re just assuming that (practically unfalsifiably) when the director suggests nothing of the sort, when footage gets cut from movies literally all the time for every reason under the Sun, and when there’s shit in that movie an order of magnitude more provocative (see: the skin room) than a woman with hairy armpits (let alone historically accurately).

      source

      • texture@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        yeah thats why i said “id just assume” not “i think”

        also, youre really mixing up provocative with patriarchal and thats unfortunate.

        anyway, simple misunderstanding. cheers

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • jdr@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Image

        Wow. That’s a skin room alright.

        source