Comment on Robbed
texture@lemmy.world 5 hours agoyeah thats why i said “id just assume” not “i think”
also, youre really mixing up provocative with patriarchal and thats unfortunate.
anyway, simple misunderstanding. cheers
Comment on Robbed
texture@lemmy.world 5 hours agoyeah thats why i said “id just assume” not “i think”
also, youre really mixing up provocative with patriarchal and thats unfortunate.
anyway, simple misunderstanding. cheers
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
“I’d just assume” is functionally the same as “I think”, because nobody first asked you “well if you had to assume, what would’ve happened?” We’re all adults here; we all understand what words mean.
And I used “provocative” because you’re directly implying a form of patriarchical censorship for inherently one of two reasons or some combination: the patriarchical system 1) thinks it’s too provocative or 2) thinks it’s too superfluous, and (2) isn’t per se patriarchy; reasonable minds can differ on whether the scene merited inclusion. I’m sure it wasn’t like that scene from The Room where they make a big deal out of Mark’s clean-shaven face; I’m sure the protein filaments growing out of Robbie’s armpits weren’t the nominal objective of the scene. Thus I assumed you were referring to the only one that’s strictly, inherently patriarchical for which there wouldn’t be a more plausible explanation.