Comment on .ml has got to be the only place on earth where I'd get downvoted for a comment like this
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days agoThat seems spurious, and I’d like to see some evidence supporting that there’s validity in that position before I entertained the idea that it’s a valid metric with which one could evaluate ‘democracy’.
Perhaps you could even do a study on that subject?
Regardless of you trying to shift the scope here, the study emphatically does not support the conclusion you attempted to use it to draw. You can ruminate on the philosophical cud that is opinion polling all you like, but that was not the object of the study, and it’s fundamentally dishonest to present it like it supports your claims.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
I pretty clearly disagree with how you’re reading this.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
As does the study itself disagree with your interpretation.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Kinda. Still, I pretty clearly believe that people’s perceptions are the most important for seeing how democratic a system is.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
In the more tedious parts of this internet this would be called a “red herring” argument.
Yes it’s an interesting idea, but it has little bearing on you having used a study with a clearly defined scope to support a claim that is outside of that scope.