Comment on .ml has got to be the only place on earth where I'd get downvoted for a comment like this
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days agoIn the more tedious parts of this internet this would be called a “red herring” argument.
Yes it’s an interesting idea, but it has little bearing on you having used a study with a clearly defined scope to support a claim that is outside of that scope.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
I disagree that it’s outside the scope.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Why? It’s quite explicit.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
I have been explicit already.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, sorry; I meant what in the terms of the study makes you think your interpretation is valid? You do have access to it, after all it’s publicly available data, so can you please show me where in the explanation of scope from the study that your interpretation is somehow valid?