Comment on First the frogs turned gay and now this

• blarghly@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Well of course. But some people want to hunt, and that desire can be the thing that tips the scale for them to get them to plunk down the money. Its the same reason NPR gives you a tote bag when you donate to them - people can carry noble intentions in their hearts, but they carry selfishness too. Effective fundraising targets both.

  And again, they are only killing animals which are already dying (as far as I know). Preserves keep track of the health of their lions and elephants and other large, popular animals. If a lion is on the verge of death, the preserve has 2 choices - watch it starve to death and get eaten by hyenas; or pop it with a rifle and kill it instantly. And if a rich white guy wants to pull the trigger in exchange for a pile of cash? Great.

  source
• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  elephants are also pretty much enderaged, the forest elephant even moreso. they have verys low reproduction, like 22months to give birth.

  source

  • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Hunting old or sick animal that cant reproduct does not effect that.

    Hunting unstable animal that kills younglins of other males only helps with this.

    source
• MrFinnbean@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  When was the last time you donated money for animal sanctuary?

  source
• brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  In this view, I’d like to ask whether it is also psycho to buy dead animals in plastic from the grocery store, bring them home and cook and eat them.

  And if I may draw a parallel: “those benefactors could just donate money, why do they need a gala?“ It’s so much easier to part us from our money when we have some little reason or tangible thing (like donor gifts from public radio).

  For this big group who is all us humans, “everyone could …” prob can’t compete with “IF you do, then reward”.

  —

  Heart: with you!

  Logical brain: “wait but the utilitarian perspective…! Minimize total suffering regardless of personal emotional discomfort!” :) (practical implication perhaps that campaign to get those hunters to keep donating but stop killing would be counterproductive to animals?? IDK how it’d pencil out!)

  source