Nope.
There will be an exact egg that contains the first chicken (defined as an animal that can fuck other chickens and produce offspring IIRC), that came before the first chicken because the chicken was in the egg.
Nope.
There will be an exact egg that contains the first chicken (defined as an animal that can fuck other chickens and produce offspring IIRC), that came before the first chicken because the chicken was in the egg.
MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I’m no biologist, but I’m pretty sure this ignores how fluid the evolution is from regular bird to proto-chicken to chicken.
howrar@lemmy.ca 11 hours ago
By the well ordering theorem, no matter what you choose as your definition of “chicken”, there must be a first.
RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Not really there is a well defined line that defines what is/isn’t a chicken, that’s really the only thing needed for this question.
The issue is the term proto-chicken isn’t well defined.
But for it to be considered a different species it would have to not be able to reproduce with a modern chicken (which doesn’t mean it can’t reproduce with early chickens).
Typhoon@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
You’ll have no problem citing the exact definition then.
RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 day ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_junglefowl
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species