Reasonable person is a consistently used terminology in law. That is because objectivity can be achieved in certain circumstances. Say someone rapes, murders and necrophiles a person of any age. That is objectively an evil action in which any reasonable person would condem the perpetrator.
Comment on Dumb stance
paranoid@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoHonestly this is a pretty big topic in philosophy. It could be argued that morality is a human construct and therefore must be subjective.
Some people believe that not going to church each week is amoral, but some atheists think organized religion is amoral - who is right?
You and I can agree that murder is immoral. Would that stance change if we were on the jury for a murder trial and, if found guilty, the offender would be sentenced to death? If that doesn’t make us murderers, what makes the death penalty an appropriate and moral punishment?
Simply replying “false” indicates little to no thought on the subject or its nuance, and gives off strong “I’m 13 and this is deep” vibes
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
paranoid@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The law is meant to be fair (which is a separate can of worms, but the goal is fairness). It is not meant to be moral, though it often follows what people generally consider to be moral, like don’t rape or murder people.
And, honestly, using the “reasonable person” argument here goes against your point - it indicates that people with different morals exist, and therefore morality must be subjective.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Gimme a minute I have to go to sleep. But, you’re obviously wrong.
paranoid@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Cool, sounds legit
cattywampas@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Who decides what a reasonable person is? Well a reasonable person, obviously.
Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
I think all of these actions are morally wrong but could you tell me how they are objective and not subjective? A reasonable person seems to be a person and consequently fundamentally subjective.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Wrong
Tonava@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
You can also jump straight to the top and argue it’s because the human experience itself is always subjective, since meat doesn’t seem to be very good at observing Reality. And then we get to cogito ergo sum and all that jazz