Comment on Anon beats his meat
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 16 hours agoI think it just uses the canal that’s already there if you don’t opt for zero-depth. Not sure how functional the vagina is though, but iirc the penis functionality is usually preserved.
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Considering the extent of corpus spongiosum, part of the root of the penis, I don’t see how you could shove it aside and put a hole and the vulva in there. Except if it’s some kinda microvagina.
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Two words: inguinal canal.
Though that would still be awkward, as it would mean the new vagina’s off to the side instead of in the middle.
Not saying it’s for sure how it’s done (I have no idea on that), just that I think that’s the “canal” OP is referencing.
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Fuck me in the passage in the anterior abdominal wall, daddy.
(Also, some of the photos on the matter resemble Giger’s paintings a bit too much.)
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 15 hours ago
Do the balls just gone on either side of that then? Or do they push it out of the way?
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Not sure what kind of anatomy you have where the balls are in the pathway of the dick.
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 13 hours ago
Just normal anatomy. Just frequently put the balls into their storage space above.