Comment on Its Over š
HikingVet@lemmy.ca āØ10ā© āØhoursā© agoNo, Iām not. Just because you are mire isolated than me, does not mean I am lucky.
Comment on Its Over š
HikingVet@lemmy.ca āØ10ā© āØhoursā© agoNo, Iām not. Just because you are mire isolated than me, does not mean I am lucky.
big_slap@lemmy.world āØ9ā© āØhoursā© ago
whatās an ideal number of people you consider to be sufficient? just curious
HikingVet@lemmy.ca āØ9ā© āØhoursā© ago
I donāt have one. I find questions like this to be inflammatory
big_slap@lemmy.world āØ9ā© āØhoursā© ago
im not sure why you found it inflammatory as it was a genuine question. regardless, apologies
HikingVet@lemmy.ca āØ8ā© āØhoursā© ago
Take a moment to think about that.
Leg@sh.itjust.works āØ3ā© āØhoursā© ago
I used to have no one in my life whoād initiate, and was quite happy with that. So from my perspective, 3 does sound like a good number of friends willing to keep you in their circle, but of course we donāt know the first thing about you or your circumstances. What is it about those 3 people that makes it feel like their effort isnāt enough to stop your feelings of isolation? I assume if itās not about quantity, itās about quality. Am I on the mark, or is it something else you find unsatisfactory?
kajib@lemmy.dbzer0.com āØ6ā© āØhoursā© ago
Super weird response imo. Thereās nothing wrong with prefering more people to check in, you donāt need a specific number
HikingVet@lemmy.ca āØ6ā© āØhoursā© ago
And thatās what Iām trying to get across.