AI is just another dot com bubble event. We still have websites, don’t you think? Most AI services are providing little to no value for the average person, but some are. I am willing to bet that these are going to be the survivors. As in every new technology driven revolution, I’d say. And with higher complexity comes higher automation rates. The current technology has more complexity, data and information than ever, hence automation is still there. But who am i to tell.
Comment on Generative AI Use Among Game Developers Falls to 29% in 2026, Survey Shows | Outlook Respawn
Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 16 hours agoIf people put slop in their games I’m gonna assume the whole thing was done with that little care. simple and easy ;) If you want to make trash i hope it sells like trash.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 5 hours ago
The main difference between Ai and the .com bubble is that AI has it’s enshitification built in. Tech companies are in unison degrading their products and engaging in anti consumer practices that would not fly in the .com era. Ai will follow a regular tech “disruption cycle” it will be sold as a discount to game devs as a miracle tool and when they are dumb enough to de-skill they will raise the prices 500% and give a more neutered product compared to their own monopolies.
And with that aside what a waste of my life to throw away on the creative output of a machine. Especially with so many great games out there. If every game in the future is made by a fucking AI i can just sit back and ang enjoy the human made backlog. Or search for communities of humans who still enjoy creating.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
anti consumer practices that would not fly in the .com era I was curious about the whole ordeal again, and even than corporations tried, and obtained, many things that we deem as good in comparison with the thing we have now, but 1999 -2001 laid the groudwork for the next social media revoltion (2005 - 2007) that brought us here. But the outlook on technology was more positive, overall, and we weren’t digital addicts wandering around the streets. But there are analogies here and there. I don’t think the AI bubble is a subprime like event.
Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 5 hours ago
In my eyes the AI bubble is an attempt of monopolization of all white collar industries by a fue tech oligarch degenerates. Thins will get increasingly worse if we let them.
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Literal judging a book by its cover mention.
But I do agree that generative software proliferation can certainly lead to a flood of low-quality trash.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
The problem of genAI software is that it comes from non technical users. Ideally, knowing the logic of a program is necessary to even imagine one. They always show these nicey nicey flow-charts with logic and decision based pathways. A non technical user will spit out a software that they wouldn’t know how to fix, don’t you think? And if fixing the software is more time consuming than writing it, the balance shifts towards manual work
TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Off topic, but I read books, and I can tell publishers leverage " judging a book by its cover" extremely well, because it is true, otherwise I couldn’t tell an academic edition or a general edition. A book with an AI cover is, in general, a bad idea, and it conveys low quality to the reader. Some open source books use AI to format an epub file; some use text recognition without professional formatting, and it is a disaster to read. You are better off getting an old pdf edition or paying a premium for a publisher’s modernised version.