We’ll know when we see an excessive use of em dashes and single words after a period in an NPC’s dialogue text.
Comment on Generative AI Use Among Game Developers Falls to 29% in 2026, Survey Shows | Outlook Respawn
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Generative AI as in image generation, text generation, predictive text, Code Intellisense, AutoComplete, etc?
This is too vague. Not only is “Generative AI” not qualified/specified as to what actually counts under that label according to the article, this would realistically also rely on people voluntarily responding and being honest. This particular survey is probably going to attract more responses from people that hate “AI” in its current general sense than from people that actually use it.
Also, most people that currently work in the games industry are in art (digital painting, texture painting, 3d modeling, etc), so obviously most of them are going to say it will negatively effect games as a whole. Regardless of whether that is true or not, the impact of perceived “job security” by trying to influence executives/management by negatively responding to “Generative AI” surveys is enough to skew the data to the paint that I believe it does not actually reflect reality. In other words, I believe that negative responses are being given for reasons other than “the tool is not helpful or useful,” but instead “I hate the tool.” Much like how animation artists first responded to the computer replacing cel animation technique. The people that hated computers animation talked down on the computers not because it would make their job easier, but because they thought they would lose their job if they talked positively about it. The sad fact is that people will lose their job regardless, especially in the current game industry where you can make a huge hit successful game and still get fired.
Generative AI is a tool, just like PhotoShop or Visual Studio. Its not a particularly useful tool for most of the stuff it is marketed to do, but it does have some use cases where I find it is a helpful tool. Asking “In which file is XYZ struct defined?” or “Explain to me ZYX function and what it returns” when working with a codebase you didn’t write yourself or have a team of others working on can be genuinely helpful (especially if the actual people that wrote the code are not available to do that). However, asking it to write specialized code for you is going to be a bad time because it will almost certainly not work correctly.
Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
True, but you wouldn’t know if it was generated text first and then edited/altered manually by a person.
Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 17 hours ago
If people put slop in their games I’m gonna assume the whole thing was done with that little care. simple and easy ;) If you want to make trash i hope it sells like trash.
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Literal judging a book by its cover mention.
But I do agree that generative software proliferation can certainly lead to a flood of low-quality trash.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
The problem of genAI software is that it comes from non technical users. Ideally, knowing the logic of a program is necessary to even imagine one. They always show these nicey nicey flow-charts with logic and decision based pathways. A non technical user will spit out a software that they wouldn’t know how to fix, don’t you think? And if fixing the software is more time consuming than writing it, the balance shifts towards manual work
TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Off topic, but I read books, and I can tell publishers leverage " judging a book by its cover" extremely well, because it is true, otherwise I couldn’t tell an academic edition or a general edition. A book with an AI cover is, in general, a bad idea, and it conveys low quality to the reader. Some open source books use AI to format an epub file; some use text recognition without professional formatting, and it is a disaster to read. You are better off getting an old pdf edition or paying a premium for a publisher’s modernised version.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
AI is just another dot com bubble event. We still have websites, don’t you think? Most AI services are providing little to no value for the average person, but some are. I am willing to bet that these are going to be the survivors. As in every new technology driven revolution, I’d say. And with higher complexity comes higher automation rates. The current technology has more complexity, data and information than ever, hence automation is still there. But who am i to tell.
Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 7 hours ago
The main difference between Ai and the .com bubble is that AI has it’s enshitification built in. Tech companies are in unison degrading their products and engaging in anti consumer practices that would not fly in the .com era. Ai will follow a regular tech “disruption cycle” it will be sold as a discount to game devs as a miracle tool and when they are dumb enough to de-skill they will raise the prices 500% and give a more neutered product compared to their own monopolies.
And with that aside what a waste of my life to throw away on the creative output of a machine. Especially with so many great games out there. If every game in the future is made by a fucking AI i can just sit back and ang enjoy the human made backlog. Or search for communities of humans who still enjoy creating.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 6 hours ago