I grant you that you’ve answered my first question. My bad for accusing you of not answering it, the message got lost in the same paragraph that was justifying an answer refusal.
I have clarified “what are hoomans” in a well defined manner and I’ll do it again: Hoomans are like any human you don’t know, but it’s been found out that they’re not from the Homo sapiens species.
I also clarified that to have a false equivalency you have to have two different things being regarded as equivalent, which none of my questions have.
What’s the difference between a human and a non-human animal that justifies calling the fisting of one rape and not the other?
lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
You can’t specifically point to your answer to my question because you haven’t answered it. So I’ll pose if for the third time:
The same way you can’t point to a concern that I left unaddressed, because there isn’t. So I’ll pose it for the third time as well:
Malfeasant@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Go away sea lion
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Image
Image
You’re not a goldfish, so clearly you’re engaging in bad faith. Blocked.
lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
I grant you that you’ve answered my first question. My bad for accusing you of not answering it, the message got lost in the same paragraph that was justifying an answer refusal.
I have clarified “what are hoomans” in a well defined manner and I’ll do it again: Hoomans are like any human you don’t know, but it’s been found out that they’re not from the Homo sapiens species. I also clarified that to have a false equivalency you have to have two different things being regarded as equivalent, which none of my questions have.
What’s the difference between a human and a non-human animal that justifies calling the fisting of one rape and not the other?