Comment

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

I have already answered all of them. No one can answer the “question” (invalid due to the flaws I’ve identified that haven’t been addressed) that concerns the “hooman”. I would answer it if it could be answered.

source

Sort:hotnew top

lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

I’m really not worried about that being the impression folks take away from this conversation

I grant you that.

Now please remind me what was your answer to “If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn’t rape?”.

Also please point out the concern with the second question that went unaddressed.

source
- theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Scroll up
  
  source
  - lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    You can’t specifically point to your answer to my question because you haven’t answered it. So I’ll pose if for the third time:
    
    If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn’t rape?
    
    The same way you can’t point to a concern that I left unaddressed, because there isn’t. So I’ll pose it for the third time as well:
    
    If I DNA test the slave from earlier and discover they aren’t human, inseminating them without consent wouldn’t be rape?
    
    source
    Malfeasant@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Go away sea lion
    
    source
    theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    You can’t specifically point to your answer to my question because you haven’t answered it.
    
    If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn’t rape?
    
    Image
    
    If I DNA test the slave from earlier and discover they aren’t human, inseminating them without consent wouldn’t be rape?
    
    Image
    
    You’re not a goldfish, so clearly you’re engaging in bad faith. Blocked.
    
    source