It’s not a live service game though.
Comment on The Game Awards 2023: List of Winners
Zero@ezekielrage.com 6 months agoIt has nothing to do with DLC. I think it deserved the award. Instead of just letting the game die that it shouldn’t have released in the first place. They fixed it.
Cexcells@lemmy.world 6 months ago
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Awarded to a game for outstanding development of ongoing content that evolves the player experience over time.
Its best ongoing game, not best live service game. I think things like Stardew Valley or No Man’s Sky fit into this just like Cyberpunk did because dev’s should be praised for when they go above and beyond. I’d argue CDPR owed that to their fans but still, they mostly pulled it off.
sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
Didn’t they announce that they weren’t going to do anymore updates besides bug changes like…last week? Am I hallucinating that?
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Cyberpunk? Think that’s right but I’d argue that would put them out of the running of this category in 2024 rather than this year’s.
GoodEye8@lemm.ee 6 months ago
There’s a huge indie scene with loads of ongoing games that would be far more deserving of the award than Cyberpunk. Cyberpunk literally stopped major developments with 2.0, the rest you’re going to get are easy to include content and QoL. Compare that to Dwarf Fortress that has 20+ years of development and is only 50% done with the final vision. You could probably also stick Terraria there because despite the devs saying multiple times that they’re done they’re still updating the game. I’m sure there’s more but those two were just at the top of my head.
The only merit CP77 has to be on that list is fixing a broken game. Do you think CP77 would’ve won the award if it had release in the 2.0 state and gotten 3 years of additional development? Would it even make it into the nominees list? I don’t think so.
LucidNightmare@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Shit, if that’s the case, I would rather Stardew or No Man’s get it because THOSE games actually added and improved the whole game with each update!
And this is coming from someone who was able to play Cyberpunk at launch with minimal bugs and actually enjoyed it and still do!
9cpluss@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I think we might have different expectations here. I think if a company sells a broken game, they should fix it without praise. The consumers paid for it. Specially should they not get an award for that. There should be a category for “most stable release” instead.
OscarRobin@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Exactly. I can’t believe how much praise people are giving Cyberpunk for not being broken anymore. Like bro that ain’t an achievement.
loki_d20@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I think the reason it gets praised is because it’s very rare that poor games get as much time and investment into fixing in this day and age. Most companies will just move into the next game or even use AI to write their apology letters and then abandon the game entirely.
EntirelyUnlovable@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Yeah I feel that, Rage 2 still has a game breaking bug that will lock you out of your perma-death run on the final mission with just never got fixed.
Ketloch@lemmynsfw.com 6 months ago
Yeah, what actually happened here is they put out a broken, unfinished game 3 years ago, have spent the last 3 years on damage control and fixing it (which means it never changed overall price on the store like a 3 year old game should) and now they want you to buy an Xpac and the ultimate edition so they can sell it again, still for full price. It’s not worth an award, it’s scummy.