Comment

1.This is an illustration, and not a logo. 2. AI (or more correctly stable diffusion) is useless for logo design since the resulting image is a raster, and logos need to be in vector format since you’ll be stretching them to fit into various applications. This is also the reason behind the minimalist logo craze nowadays - a logo needs to be recognizable in an app icon, and on a jumbo billboard. 3. AI is a black box which gives wildly inconsistent results, and nobody can tell why it does a certain thing - maybe it picked up something from the training data and now its replicating it everywhere. So anyone’s guess is as good as the other.

Tl;dr hire an actual designer you cheapskate

source

Sort:hotnew top

Starski@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
While most of this is true, calling an illustration of their logo not a logo is nitpicking to an absurd degree

source
filcuk@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Logo is an illustration. Logotype can be all text, but even then it’s usually highly stylised.

One should have a vector of their logo, but it doesn’t really matter unless it’s going to print. Logos shouldn’t be larger than a thumbprint anywhere else.

Obviously AI will output terrible logos, can’t agree more, but some people are selling stuff from their garage and simply have many other priorities before spending on a logo.
For those people, having anything is better than nothing.
source
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
I’ll pay a nickel to an illustrator to get me a logo for my band, I Just Farted, that looks like a dairy farm

source