Comment

That is a much safer assumption. Assume they are both malicious and smart. If they aren’t, you haven’t lost anything (except for the very small chance to get away with something, but if you rely on the cops being benevolent and/or dumb, maybe overthink your whole plan).

source

Sort:hotnew top

mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
No. Assuming they’re smart isn’t necessary, nor is it realistic.

All you need to assume is that they’re malicious. They are rewarded for fucking people over. That’s all that matters

Now grow up and quit insisting on having the last word in the argument as if that makes you right

source
- LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Nice bait: do I take it, and therefore lose, or do I not, and therefore let you have the last word?
  
  Eh, we all know it. I am right, since I have the last word. I work at a pretty slow job, I have unlimited coffee and time, try me.
  
  source