You’re thinking of single occupancy bathrooms. Unisex bathrooms have the same capacity as segregated
Comment on I am definitely a bird me personally
knexcar@lemmy.world 8 hours agoUnisex bathrooms have a worse capacity-to-space ratio compared to regular ones - aka they can’t handle as many people. Which means they’re not a suitable replacement for places with a high volume of bathroom visits.
MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 hours ago
knexcar@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
The original comment said unisex single occupant, and unisex multi occupant bathrooms are almost unheard of. I only know they exist because one arcade bar near me made their bathrooms all gender but I feel like they only get away with it due to being in a very liberal area.
MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 8 hours ago
I don’t mean to have one toilet in one larger room, but to have several(more than two) small rooms with one toilet a piece along like a hall or something. Same total square footage as a traditional public restroom, just structured to be a single occupant. Think like a line of portapotties.
knexcar@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Do the small rooms still have sinks though, or are they shared? I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a bathroom like this. Are the “rooms” the same size/layout as standard bathroom stalls, just more private?
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I’ve seen this before. The rooms are like “traditional” bathroom stalls in size and amenities, with the sinks in one place outside. It ends up being structured a lot like a normal multi-person bathroom, just with real rooms for each stall.
possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 hours ago
in most Nordic countries, they don’t care about gendered bathrooms in a large number of places. the solution is easy- extend the doors lower and higher on the stalls. they also don’t have a problem with seat pissers for whatever reason