I doubt that since the comment was a suggestion to read and cite herself. If she did cite herself the assumption would be that she did read the citations so the comment would be moot, no? Why would they suggest to cite herself if she already did?
Comment on I think there's an imposter amongus
dustyData@lemmy.world 1 day agoShe probably did. But the reviewer won’t know that as the paper (should) get anonymized before review. The author’s own name will be censored all the way throughout the paper.
fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Because the reviewer didn’t actually read the paper
trolske@feddit.org 1 day ago
Depending on field, double-blind reviews are rare. In ecology I had maybe one or two reviews in 5 years that were double-blinded, normally you see the author list as a reviewer