Comment on Apparently, all YouTube Rewinds have been unlisted as of today.

P1k1e@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• TachyonTele@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Why have them? What are they?

  source

  • Zorque@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Marketing videos, mostly. Ostensibly they’re original videos showcasing some of the talent and content from the previous year. The last couple of years have been particularly bland, though, as I understand it.

    source
  • Tilgare@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    They shouldn’t exist because you don’t know what they are?

    source

    • Zorque@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Maybe they just don’t know and are asking for community context.

      source
    • TachyonTele@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      How os asking what they are the same as saying they shouldn’t exist?

      I’m so tired of all the bad faith bs on this site.

      source

      • Tilgare@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Maybe it was my own misunderstanding.

        Why have them?

        If this doesn’t mean, “why should they even exist?” what was it that you meant here? Because that’s what you ask first, before you ask what they are.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• webp@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Why? They have a monopoly. They do whatever the fuck they want.

  source

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    But why do they want to do that, is the question

    source

    • webp@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      In the past the videos were always shit and people would thus shit on them in the comments/ratings, so it might be to hide how much shittier it’s getting. For example if there is so much generated content that it would take up a chunk of the video, or it might even be that they’ve fired the talent who normally create the rewinds and replaced them with AI, which would be fairly obvious to detect if it was used for this kind of thing because it probably would do a shit job.

      source