Comment on Where are the arms bearers?

• LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I mean someone just gather the suicide statistics and gather all those people who want to commit suicide and put them in a voluntary civil war up against the ice agents and there ya go. Two birds, one stone. 🐦 🐦 🪨

  source
• Drbreen@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’ve provided context to my question which I should’ve initially. I don’t think it’s relevant what I would personally do as the question is towards the argument for bearing arms (which I’ve heard a lot of) is in case of government tyranny. So let’s try to keep it within that context, however, it is a difficult question to answer from my perspective because I don’t live within gun culture. I may have a different view if I were born and raised in such a culture. But in short, the answer is most likely a no, regardless of how angry I am about it but then again…

  source

  • Poojabber@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Ok, as an “arms bearer,” my answer is this. The laws allowing us to bear arms were written when those arms were equivalent or close to the top military technology. 100 armed civilians while untrained, would be similarly equppied to 100 soldiers. These days if 100 armed civilians tried to act in a coordinated armed effort against our government, it would only be a very short matter of time before they were declared terrorist and overwhelmed by billions of dollars of military hardware and equipment they have no way of competing with. That is of course with the exception of jan 6th where said coordinated attack was coordinated by trump, and therefore allowed to happen.

    That all being said, I am an “arms bearer” because I used to hunt, and was never one to claim I had guns to possibly overthrow our corrupt as hell government.

    source