Jatco CVTs are notoriously garbage. Subaru makes their own cvt and it’s pretty good. Between that and the direct interaction engine my Forester gets better mileage than my wife’s old accord.
Comment on You guys need to stop
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 months agoWhy all the CVT hate? I drove a Jeep Patriot that had a CVT for about 100,000 miles before any major things broke, and what broke on me was the engine, not the transmission. That thing has great gas milage, as long as you used the CVT properly. Also need to swap out the air filter, oil filter, spark plugs, and plug wires, cause the ones that Chrysler puts on are crap, but if you do that, and keep your tach as close to 1000-1500 rpm as possible, I was getting 35/50 mpg.
rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 months ago
psycho_driver@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The thing is, good modern automatics should last more than 100,000 miles. Motors should definitely last more than 100,000 miles, but from what I see online a lot that seems to be about the use-by date for Stelantis motors. Nissan (Jatco) CVTs were notorious for failing at or a little before 100k, and Nissan was one of the first (maybe the first) to mass adopt the CVT into their vehicles. It’s sad because Nissan had reached near engineering perfection on their VQ/VK motors and their traditional automatics prior to Renault getting involved in their business. Our 2011 Armada, the gas guzzling bitch that she is, runs like its new with 200k miles on the motor and tranny (both engineered in the late 90s).
CADmonkey@lemmy.world 7 months ago
There’s always that one guy with a jatco CVT that hasn’t failed yet. Those are called “ouliers” and are not representative.
rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I had a Sentra once upon a time with a Jatco CVT that worked fine. Bunch of other shit wrong with that cat though. So that’s two guys now