Comment on Indie game developers have a new sales pitch: being ‘AI free’

• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Since you would never see it that’s pretty much irrelevant. Clearly this is about AI generated art and AI generated assets

  Whether or not you use AI to grey box something is a pointless distinction given the fact that there’s no way to prove it one way or the other.

  source

  • Gladaed@feddit.org ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    But it still removes labor from the working class. My point is that the lines are blurry. You practically cannot draw a useful line based on the tooling used.

    source

    • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The AI label needs to be present if the finished product contains AI generated assets. So AI generated code, or AI generated art.

      In the example above you grey boxed in AI but then replaced all the assets with ones that humans made. There is no distinction there between doing that and just having literal grey boxes.

      You couldn’t require an AI label in that scenario because it would be utterly unenforceable. How would a developer prove if they did or did not use AI for temporary art?

      So yes you can draw a line. Does the finished product contain AI generated assets. You don’t like that definition because you’re being pedantic but your pedantry interpretation isn’t enforceable, so it’s useless.

      source

      • Gladaed@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Is a scene arranged by AI not undesirable since it does not have artistic intent?

        source