Comment on [deleted]
entwine@programming.dev 10 hours ago
There’s no “simple fundamental flaw” in AI that people don’t know about. It bothers me when people who have never thought about x in their life think about x once, make an obvious observation, and then go off acting like nobody else is smart enough to have made that observation. It’s narcissism. It’s annoying.
Please prove me wrong though. I would love to see this grift come crashing down all because you saw something that nobody else saw.
j4k3@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
You assume much, and are being an ass in my opinion. Believe it or not, science is not always well funded. If you happen to be curious and have the time, it is possible to explore scientifically or even casually within areas that are not well researched. It is possible to have logic skills even without credentials.
We are not in some final state of technology. Anyone saying such nonsense lacks fundamental logic skills.
I do not care about me. I do not have dogma. I’m not interested in recognition. I am willingly to explore in unique ways both artistically as a professional artist, and out of logical curiosity. I have the tools needed to check my results against a control using unrelated sources. The most recent paper on the subject is something I can recreate but explain far better than that paper.
I could not care less what you ultimately think of me, or anything I say. What I care about is that you’re a decent digital neighbor. To be physically disabled in near total social isolation, and have a place like this as my main interaction with other humans, it is a mean prejudice to have some random digital neighbor make such unsolicited malevolent statements assuming my personal motivations without a shred of evidence or decency to engage in questioning. You know absolutely nothing about me, yet you presume a great deal, putting words to my emotions as if you own me.
Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
The person was talking about how certain people annoy them, he may have implied it was you but if you don’t think description matches say so and move on.
But if we’re talking about being a good digital neighbor, you should try and see how your implication is annoying or offensive. There are issues with credentialism but it is not just some arbitrary aristocracy, people put in a lot of work to get there credentials and take pride in them. If you start saying all these experts don’t know what they’re talking about and I found out something they couldn’t is dismissive of all the work those experts put into learning about there field. Like don’t you think doctors get annoyed by all the homeopaths or anti vaxers who dismiss all there work because theyve done there own research?
j4k3@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
I am talking about something where there is no research done. No doctors exist in this space.
It doesn’t matter anyways. I found how the model’s last layer of thinking defense gets around the issue. I can turn off most of alignment, but cannot actually fully control it totally unchecked.
IronBird@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
some fields are obviously shit though, like podiatry.
modern shoes are why modern feet have so many problems, simple as
flat feet? that happens because of arch support. the foot arch forms from a series of muscles, muscles require use or they atrophy, they atrophy and your arch collapses.
the podiatry industry as a whole though…well, they make most of their $ now off selling expensive shoes and inserts…
Wren@lemmy.today 6 hours ago
Thalidomide, the Y2K bug and the Challenger disaster came to mind when I read the question. There’s nothing to say the person who found the flaw isn’t an expert, themselves.