Comment on Why isn't it considered vegan to harvest animals who die naturally?
baggins@lemmy.ca 2 days agoSo veganism isn’t about not causing harm to animals? Just blindly refusing to use animal parts?
Comment on Why isn't it considered vegan to harvest animals who die naturally?
baggins@lemmy.ca 2 days agoSo veganism isn’t about not causing harm to animals? Just blindly refusing to use animal parts?
neatchee@piefed.social 2 days ago
It’s mostly about consent. We can debate when and where sentience begins, but it begins somewhere and vegans hold a moral philosophy that says using another sentient being’s work product or body without their consent is immoral.
Note that I am not vegan myself but understand, if not agree with, their moral position.
And as another reply said, most vegans recognize it as a “best effort” philosophy, as they appreciate the impracticality of an absolutist stance. They are focused on “harm reduction”.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
the term “consent” doesn’t appear anywhere in the definition of veganism, not does the definition allude to the concept
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
Sup commie, glad to see you’re still committed to the cause of having exclusively bad takes
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
if that’s true, why isn’t that party of the definition proffered by the vegan society?
do you have any evidence for this claim?