Comment on Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.

• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I was going to chime in on this thread, but then I saw who it was that you’re arguing with.

  I would save my breath if I were you. Not worth the time.

  source

  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Then you chimed in anyway. Sorry I criticised your holy scripture

    source

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Wow you got me.

      source

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Sure did

        source
• BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I’m not saying Wikipedia is infallible

  Actually, you undeniably did: you said it “just lists facts”. You said that “Wikipedia itself is evidence that Wikipedia is factual”. You literally just said that “it’s better than any collection of knowledge humanity ever had.”

  This is how someone talks about religious scripture.

  Until then, don’t do the regular accusatory confessions you all do, it’s very boring and predictable.

  Go back to Reddit you wannabe anime villain loser. Jesus Christ, you zealots are incapable of not talking like the most bad faith smug man children alive.

  But here’s an example for your bad faith ass: Wikipedia states Israel has universal suffrage. Now let’s here your apologetic for why your holy book is correct even though it contradicts reality

  source