Comment on Don't like the 'left liberal bias' of cited and sourced Wikipedia articles? Not a problem, our lord and savior Elon is introducing Grokipedia.

• Nalivai@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I can bring up a lot of wrongs with the bible. I would like you to do the same with Wikipedia. Bring an example.
  Just to be clear, since it seems it needs to be spelled out to you, I’m not saying Wikipedia is infallible, quite the opposite, it’s written by people. I’m saying there are mechanisms and culture to correct the wrongs, which means it’s better than probably any collection of knowledge humanity ever had.
  So again, if you have examples, bring them up. Until then, don’t do the regular accusatory confessions you all do, it’s very boring and predictable.

  source

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I was going to chime in on this thread, but then I saw who it was that you’re arguing with.

    I would save my breath if I were you. Not worth the time.

    source

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Then you chimed in anyway. Sorry I criticised your holy scripture

      source

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Wow you got me.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I’m not saying Wikipedia is infallible

    Actually, you undeniably did: you said it “just lists facts”. You said that “Wikipedia itself is evidence that Wikipedia is factual”. You literally just said that “it’s better than any collection of knowledge humanity ever had.”

    This is how someone talks about religious scripture.

    Until then, don’t do the regular accusatory confessions you all do, it’s very boring and predictable.

    Go back to Reddit you wannabe anime villain loser. Jesus Christ, you zealots are incapable of not talking like the most bad faith smug man children alive.

    But here’s an example for your bad faith ass: Wikipedia states Israel has universal suffrage. Now let’s here your apologetic for why your holy book is correct even though it contradicts reality

    source