No worries I know someone from hk who loves linguistics this will get me some brownie points
Comment on Not impressed
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoThis is where the Chinese Language comes to shine. Animal, 动物, literally “moving object”, so if it has roots (aka: plants, fungi), it cannot move on its own, therefore, not a 动物, Animal.
Like the words are self-explanatory, so beautiful.
ieatpwns@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
English isn’t that far off. Animal has the same root as animate, which is the Latin anima, “soul” or “breath.” The English word plant has synonyms and general connotations of fixedness or non-intentionality.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Wouldn’t that make corals and sponges not animal, despite biologically being animals?
PyroVK@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Can’t remember for corals but sponge’s larval stage moves around before deciding on a rock to call home.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Closes Chinese Dictionary
“Listen here you little shit…”
But I mean I guess they should make a new term called 植-动物 with the 植 (to plant, to establish) character from 植物 (planted/established objects, aka: plants), thus making it “planted- moving object”, aka: plant-like animal; or conversely 动-植物 with the 动 (moving) from 动物 (moving objects, aka: animal), thus making it “moving- planted object”, aka: animal-like plant.
Its like word lego.