You can both be correct
Comment on Health Secretary Kennedy says there's 'not sufficient' proof to show Tylenol causes autism
SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 19 hours agoIts deliberately obfuscating a critical part of the quote in order to get more attention.
Its clickbait.
neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
You’re both right.
Jhex@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
what part?
how would you have worded the headline to avoid what you call clickbait?
drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
Evidence linking Tylenol and autism not definitive “but very suggestive”, says health secretary Kennedy.
theolodis@feddit.org 11 hours ago
“Suggestive evidence is information that hints at a particular conclusion but is not conclusive on its own.”
So in short, is there no conclusive evidence linking it to autism?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 11 hours ago
Kennedy hears that there is no conclusive evidence linking tylenol to autism yet assumes the causal relationship exists. (It just hasn’t been proven yet.)
Any rational person hearing that there is no conclusive evidence linking tylenol to autism assumes the causal relationship does not exist. (But acknowledges that the causal relationship has not been disproven.)
A better summary would be “Kennedy acknowledges his claims about Tylenol are not supported by evidence.”