Yeah, but this will not require any people to add content since it’s all stollen and simply manipulated which is easier to automate than producing original content which AI can’t be trusted not to hallucinate about quite yet. The idea is to then get the search engine AIs to point there as much as possible as it will likely be optimized for AI scraping rather than human browsing. Then since the AI results are prioritized more and more, they can get their truthiness to be what people see over actual reality.
Comment on Elon Musk’s Grokipedia launches with AI-cloned pages from Wikipedia
GorGor@startrek.website 1 day agoThis isn’t the first time they have tried this
irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 hours ago
GorGor@startrek.website 20 hours ago
yeah, the back end is the scarier part. I don’t think conservapedia actually added that much content, it just copied Wikipedia and edited the parts they cared about. Automating that, while helpful, isn’t that big a deal IMO. Disseminating the resultant bullshit (with a hint of plausibility) is where the nightmares begin.
Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 hours ago
Holy shit. They claim Einstein’s Theory of Relativity has something to do with moral relativism? That’s so fucking stupid.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
But you see, they share the same word, so must be similar. Big smart. Much literate.