Comment on Fictional

• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  If you take the smallest distance that exists and divide it by the shortest amount of time that can pass

  btw that’s a nonsensical argument. there can be both space and time smaller than that.

  source

  • Asetru@feddit.org ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Since the 1950s, it has been conjectured that quantum fluctuations of the spacetime metric might make the familiar notion of distance inapplicable below the Planck length.[23][37][22] This is sometimes expressed by saying that “spacetime becomes a foam at the Planck scale”.[38] It is possible that the Planck length is the shortest physically measurable distance, since any attempt to investigate the possible existence of shorter distances, by performing higher-energy collisions, would result in black hole production.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units#Planck_length

    Same is true for the Planck time, although the English Wikipedia is oddly blank for that one: there can be no space or time smaller than that within the physics that we have come up with.

    source

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      welllll i say that’s a reaaaly sketchy and irrational way to look at things.

      like, even if you smallest ruler is 1 mm, that does not mean that smaller things don’t exist. they can still play a role, i.e. through chaotic behavior smaller perturbations could be up-amplified until they are measurable.

      source

      • Asetru@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        welllll i say that’s a reaaaly sketchy and irrational way to look at things.

        Okay? You be you, I guess. I mean, stupid physicist eggheads, what do they know?

        source
      • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        ok, go measure it then dumbass

        source