Comment on That's The End Of Activision Blizzard's $120 Million Overwatch League

• Pxtl@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I like Role Queue. Single-tank was poorly thought out, I agree.

  Fundamentally, I think OW copied some things from TF2 without understanding how they interact with lower playercounts. They copied TF2’s long rollouts and respawn timers, but didn’t realize that this makes death way too costly in a small-team game. In 5v5 at a good level, a single If they want to drop playercount, they need to find a way to fix that. Imho that’s why so many of their “Arcade” modes play with alternate respawning mechanics, like freezetag or the silly “StarWatch” thing.

  Also they wanted big flashy ults without thinking how that interacts with the rest of the game. There’s a reason that most competitive twitch-FPS games don’t have nukes on the serious maps.

  Imho, if I were running OW2?

  1. For competitive: 4v4. 1 heal, 2dps, 1 tank. All healers share some kind of special rapid-respawn passive, like they can respawn at the Tank or something. Make up for it by giving more DPS classes off-heal powers like Sombra and Soldier.

  2. Nerf the ults in general. Either slower build or just lower-power. Although if you go slower-build, you need to come up with a sane way to have the charge carry between rounds, which would be tricky to get right.

  3. For casual: 8v8. Double the 4v4. There’s a reason TF2 played 12v12 casually and 6v6 competitively. If you’re farting around trying things out, you don’t want to be the lynchpin of your team.

  source

  • caseofthematts@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Now TF2 had some fun competitive matches. That takes me back.

    I think you have a lot of good points here. One of the major issues is that Competetive esports meta bled into casual Overwatch.

    source
• Jumi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I prefer role queue and I’m glad that it only cost one tank to get rid of cc/stun for everyone

  source