Comment

Comment on GOG Has Had To Hire Private Investigators To Track Down IP Rights Holders

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

Is implying plurality exaggerating things to begin with in this context? The headline is pretty vague, it doesn’t overtly exaggerate anything. It makes a pretty simple statement without embellishing anything.

But if we’re going to get into the weeds, we don’t know how many private investigators work at whatever agency they hired, or how many were involved in tracking this person down.

source

Sort:hotnew top

MotoAsh@piefed.social ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Yes. Yes implying plurality for a singular thing is, by definition, exaggerating.

source
slimerancher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It did feel like exaggeration to me, but it could be my bias. May feel differently about it later.

You are right about the fact that it could be an agency. Maybe I was just being pedantic 😀

source
- _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  I mean, we’re all being pedantic, aren’t we? honestly, I don’t even know why we wasted the time we have on this lmao. for me it’s probably because I’m working and bored to death.
  
  source
  - slimerancher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    lol, same here. Except leaning towards super annoyed because of some work related things.
    
    source
- sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Eh, when someone says “private investigator,” I subconsciously assume there could be a group involved, and not one person. If I hire a tax preparer, there are probably multiple people involved (the person preparing the tax docs, the accountants auditing those docs, people auditing their software, etc).
  
  source
ripcord@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Yes

source