Comment on photopea.com now locks out users blocking ads

• woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  The only infrastructure I’m using is the bit of Javascript and HTML

  If Photopea was so simple, you could just download the necessary parts and self-host.

  It’s won’t work because there is actual server-side code running, meaning you’re hogging someone else’s resources to do your commercial-grade tasks.

  source

  • percent@infosec.pub ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The image processing happens locally in the web browser.

    Not to imply that hosting the static assets to power that (JS and WebAssembly binaries) is free, but it’s definitely much cheaper than the compute resources that would be required to do the heavy lifting server-side.

    (Still worth paying for or allowing ads though. Photopea clearly took a lot of work to build)

    source

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The completely insane claim was “The only infrastructure I’m using is the bit of Javascript and HTML”, meaning one could just save the page and run it fully locally.

      This is of course BS.

      source
  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    This won’t work because there is actual server-side code running

    That is not true! You can figure that out for yourself - open up the site, disconnect your internet and resize/crop some images. It will do it just fine.

    source