Assuming it’s similar to dog, no, but there’s people in Switzerland who probably would consider it a delicacy.
Comment on Woof is dog for "You may test that assumption at your convenience"
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks agoIs coyote meat any good?
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 weeks ago
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Probably not. Most nonaquatic predators are awful tasting and very unhealthy to eat due to the buildup of heavy metals and other nasty stuff from further down the food chain.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Ah, figures. Otherwise it could be a source of free meat.
ArachnidMania@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
It’s not entirely correct, it’s more if it’s a scavenging predator or live hunter. Something picky for food they have hunted themselves like a mountain lion can be amazing meat, or a bear feasted on berries or live fish. But if they’ve been scavenging like a bear with dead fish and garbage or a coyote, it can be horrible meat. Depends on species too as well as diet.
Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 2 weeks ago
Sorry mate, but any first year biology student learns that the higher up the food chain the more concentrated the heavy metals are. Take Tuna. As free range as you can get but it is advised to minimize consumption, particularly when pregnant, due to the high mercury content.
While lifestyle does affect palatability of the meat (Bear near the dump always tastes ‘off’) it is more a question of ‘what’ is being bioaccumulated, not ‘if’. In your example scavengers are bioaccumulating pesticides and preservatives, whereas the successful predator accumulates all the heavy metals its prey, and their prey, and their prey (repeat until the bottom of the tree) consumed.
You can’t get around it. All high level predators have shitty meat, whether it tastes bad or not.
dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Isn’t it all in the way you cook it?