Comment on Should Neutron Stars be Added to the Periodic Table?

IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• cows_are_underrated@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Here’s what the article says:

  Assuming a periodic table in which each element is represented by a 1 cm by 2.5 cm rectangle, 40 rows of 32 elements will take up one meter of space. At this scale, a periodic table incorporating element 10^56^ would need to be 7.82 × 10^52^ meters long. This is problematic, because 7.82 × 10^52^ meters is about 10^37^ lightyears, and the universe is currently estimated span a mere 93 billion lightyears. As such, the new periodic table would be a quadrillion times larger than the observable universe.

  The universe is expanding, however, which is good news for chemists and first-home buyers. The rate of this expansion is apparently about 73 km/s for every million parsecs of space, which corresponds to 2 × 106 km/s across the entire universe.8 At that rate, the universe will be able to accommodate the new periodic table in about 10^34^ years.

  source

  • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    So it is a matter of time, I’ll star setting up a website and accept preorders for completed periodic tables

    source
• monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Depends on the font

  source