Those were disproven long before then. They are interesting to think about as different sensory inputs to engage, but are complete nonsense as far as learning styles.
Comment on Can you think of any now?
BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 day ago
I went through the two websites posted here for graduation year 2008. The only incorrect thing I was taught that I still believed was:
“Learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) determine how you best learn”
False. Huh.
multifariace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
RedFrank24@lemmy.world 1 day ago
…So what learning styles are there?
Eq0@literature.cafe 17 hours ago
Teacher here. Now we get taught that the main mechanism for learning is attention, usually triggered by a combo of motivation and diversity (as opposed to monotonicity). So you should hit a variety of teaching styles not because different students react better to some of them but because it triggers their attention and motivation mechanisms. We also get taught that switching too much tires the students out, so we should pick some 3 types of activities and rotate between them, tending to reduce the traditional lecture style.
Oh man, I could go on an in infinite rant about all this… but well, this is the recent theory.
echodot@feddit.uk 17 hours ago
My brother had to do that for the military at one point. I don’t know what the point was because apparently nothing ever came of it they just did the tests got their results and then apparently everyone forgot about it, because everyone carried on getting trained in exactly the same manner anyway.
BurgerBaron@piefed.social 13 hours ago
Oh yeah it never was applied. I just remember one of my high school English (Language Arts) teachers talking about it.
Echolynx@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
I just picked up a book on this! There is, of course, an incredibly racist history to the use of these concepts.
You Are Not a Kinesthetic Learner