Comment on Who the fuck needs an x axis anyway

Plum@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• Mirshe@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Massaging your stats to make them say what you want is basic statistics 101.

  source
• fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I guess we found the answer to “Is math invented or discovered?”

  source

  • Plum@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Bad Graph says: 0.75% of 8 year olds were diagnosed in 2000 versus 3.2% in 2020.

    Correlation =/= causation.

    How have the diagnostic criteria changed in 20 years? Autism was a stigma when I was in high school in 2000, now it’s a spectrum. Are there routine screenings at pediatricians now?

    Number go up, but what else go up simultaneously?

    I hate it here.

    source

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I tutored a young autistic man in college and he was almost non-verbal. He could communicate through speech, but only with great difficulty and stuttering. That was the only definition of autism I understood at that time, and he was considered better off than many.

      A few years later when I learned about Asperger’s because my sister got diagnosed with it, I went to get evaluated myself and after sitting down with me once, they said I’m not autistic.

      I’m about 99% sure I would be placed on the autism spectrum today.

      I don’t know whether it’s good or bad that the diagnostics / definition of autism seem to be broadening — that’s above my pay grade. But you can’t deny people who weren’t considered autistic 30 years ago are today, and so to compare autism rates which measure clearly different levels of capability is pretty useless.

      In order to compare rates, we would need a consistent set of diagnostic criteria.

      source
  • Kolonel_Kahlua@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Same guys that taxed an island full of penguins?

    source