Comment on Silent Hill f | Review Thread
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Honestly, this is exactly what I expected. This is why I can’t trust review sites anymore. They only ever score a game from 7 to 10. I mean, IGN previously scored Concord a 7/10.
Katana314@lemmy.world 1 day ago
From what I know of Concord, it kind of was a 7/10 game - It was functional, but just not impressive or interesting. The thing is, when it’s released with a fervent anticipation of being a “Live service HIT”, it was critically important to have a flood of players. At least indie singleplayer games can hit success late (Among Us being a perfect example, its first release didn’t really strike big)
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 day ago
A game that is technically functional but neither good or bad should be a 5/10, not a 7. Which is my whole point. Access reviewers/ bias reviewers do not use the whole grading scale, they only use a scale of 7-10 which is wholly unhelpful when determining game review scores.
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 19 hours ago
I usually just assume, that the scale starts at 5, that gives a good idea about the quality of the game