It doesn’t stop fascism, that’s for sure
Comment on New Arizona law to restrict online porn access; Pornhub will block state
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 months agoYeah. Voting blue no matter who turned out to not be a good strategy.
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Voting blue no matter who turned out to not be a good strategy.
It’s funny how you relabel harm-reduction in voting, and imply the alternative wouldn’t have been far worse. It’s an art.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 months ago
Weird how none of the party backed whatshisname in new York. Please stop.
ubergeek@lemmy.today 10 months ago
It’s harm reduction to vote for someone who just lets fascists implement their policies, anyways?
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 months ago
Yes because they’re quieter and the white cis middle class liberals can all pretend everything’s okay. The gay ones too, until recently.
Harm reduced.
tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
How about that Keir Starmer?
hector@lemmy.today 10 months ago
The larger problem is that the Democrats are worthless and unpopular by design. So they are incapable of defeating the Republican. There is no alternate vision, they are playing defenseon what the Republicans do.
So while it might be better than the alternative, the alternative is inevitably going to happen because they suck.
tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Exactly! Alternate visions are not welcome in politics.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 months ago
A vote for a democrat is at best toilet paper.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 months ago
Nothing makes me more hostile to the idea of voting blue than this fractally abusive rhetoric. If you’re a RNC operative, you are a very very good one.
Psythik@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It would have worked if the tankies would have actually went out out and voted blue! But no, you rather vote for genocide and fascism by staying home.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Liberals suck so much. She was probably told the talking point “protect children” yada yada and just signed it hoping to score political points without any critical thought on how it’s the opposite.
She also signed an EO that lets people get covid shots without a perscription because the fed is run by people intent on destrying the country, so.
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
She is acting on behalf of lobbyists. That’s how America got to this stage. Lobbyist lawyers and marketers write laws that benefit them, and they “donate” to politicians to pass that legislation.
The only politicians who actually read anything they vote on are leftists like Bernie and AOC; everyone else is doing what their financiers tell them to do.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Lobbyists for what?
unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Pocket pussies
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Christian Nationalism
SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Big Blueballs™
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
I wish someone would make a “protect children” bill that actually protects children
Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 10 months ago
But that would target all the people in power.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 months ago
They’re craven and evil–not compulsively evil like red team.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 months ago
And so we should need a prescription for a COVID shot? Am I misunderstanding you?
LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 months ago
No its just the contrast between nonsense and common sense.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Ah, yes, agreed