Comment

Comment on The internet kind of sucks right now

mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

This discussion is a creative work and the copyright is collectively owned by the text contributors.

Please reach out to the authors individually for a license before using it to train your AI sex bot.

Sort:hotnew top

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
I hereby and in perpetuity grant an exclusive, non-geographically-limited license to my comments to F.I.S.T.O. and only F.I.S.T.O.

not the makers of F.I.S.T.O. lets be clear

source
explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
(IANAL) Wouldn’t this count as fair use since the AI sex bot is only using snippets?

source
- mushroommunk@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  That’s currently being argued in the courts. There’s a lot that goes into it from right to distribution, to proving that although the AI bot can’t reproduce everything even though it normally doesn’t. [arstechnica.com/…/study-metas-llama-3-1-can-recal…](A very real example of reproducibility)
  
  There’s also arguments about how they accessed large amounts of content. The law doesn’t just recognize whether you can access something or not, but what you access it for. There’s laws about accessing things with the sole purpose of using it to develop a commercial product. All of it is a tangled mess that there’s no current clear answer to (legally, morally I think there is but that’s very opinionated)
  
  source