Absolutely, of course it should be allowed for medical reasons.
Comment on [deleted]
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days agoIt should be limited to medical professionals who do it for medical reasons, not for religious reasons.
Also I’m circumcised and it happened to work out well so I have no regrets, but it was done by a doctor and not as some backwards religious ceremony.
lena@gregtech.eu 2 days ago
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Wouldn’t allowed be if it was illegal…
lena@gregtech.eu 2 days ago
I shall rephrase my original comment then: “unnecessary circumcision of newborns should be illegal”
cutiepiemeli@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Dojan@pawb.social 2 days ago
Think it grew popular in the U.S. as an anti-masturbation thing. There were a LOT of those. This Kellog man was super into restricting masturbation and made cornflakes because a bland and unexciting meal would aid in preventing that.
To be fair, the colonisers were primarily religious puritans whose views were too extreme for Europe, hence why they sought new lands. It’s almost like a cult.
Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
then, after a bland breakfast…
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That’s what I said, but apparently not in enough words.
Zwiebel@feddit.org 2 days ago
Personally, I’ll have my newborns arms amputated so it’s easier to clean the armpits